The Three Costly Mistakes of Swedish B2B Marketing (And the Strategic Imperatives to Fix Them)

Executive Summary

The Swedish business-to-business (B2B) landscape presents a distinct paradox: a market characterized by world-leading digital connectivity and tech-savvy buyers (1), yet hampered by marketing strategies that often remain tactical, fragmented, and misaligned with how modern business decisions are actually made. This report dissects the three fundamental and costly strategic mistakes that prevent Swedish B2B companies from achieving sustainable, profitable growth. These are not minor tactical errors but deep-seated organizational flaws:

The Inward Gaze (Product-Centrism), The Performance Mirage (Short-Termism), and The Siloed Machine (Organizational Misalignment).

The costs of these mistakes are not trivial. A disconnect between sales and marketing teams alone can result in a 10% loss in annual revenue.(2) Companies that fail to build a strong brand are forced to pay a perpetual "tax" in the form of higher customer acquisition costs and reduced pricing power.(3) Perhaps most critically, in a market where 90% of B2B buyers will ultimately choose a vendor from the list they had in mind on day one of their research, a myopic focus on short-term lead generation means most companies are entering the race long after the winners have been decided.(5)

This report moves beyond superficial critiques of marketing consultancies—their overpriced, narrow solutions and obsession with minor iterations that yield no concrete profit (6)—to provide a robust strategic framework for remediation. It outlines three corresponding strategic imperatives that form the pillars of a modern, resilient growth strategy:

1. Achieving True Customer-Centricity: A shift from selling what you make to deeply understanding and solving the customer's true "Job-to-be-Done" through rigorous fieldwork and UX research.

2. Building Defensible Brand Equity: An investment strategy that balances short-term activation with the long-term creation of brand value, fostering trust, emotional connection, and pricing power.

3. Engineering a 'Smarketing' Growth Engine: The systematic integration of sales, marketing, and service into a unified revenue operations function, driven by shared goals, data, and accountability.

Fixing these deep-rooted issues is not merely a marketing task to be delegated; it is a C-suite-level strategic necessity. It demands a fundamental shift in mindset, investment priorities, and organizational culture. This report provides the data, frameworks, and actionable blueprint for Swedish business leaders to navigate this transformation, turning strategic flaws into a source of profound and lasting competitive advantage.

The Swedish B2B Paradox: High Digital Maturity, Lagging Strategic Insight

To understand the strategic missteps plaguing Swedish B2B marketing, one must first grasp the unique character of the market itself. Sweden stands as one of the most digitally advanced societies globally, with an eCommerce penetration rate of 80% and a population of highly qualified, tech-savvy consumers and business buyers. (1) This digital fluency extends deep into the B2B procurement process. Research indicates that over 80% of B2B buyers now conduct extensive online research during the pre-purchasing phase, long before engaging with a salesperson.(8) This self-directed journey is not a fleeting trend but a permanent fixture of the modern B2B landscape.

However, this high level of digital maturity is coupled with distinct cultural and business norms that create a complex operating environment. The Swedish business culture is famously consensus-driven, leading to lengthy and intricate decision-making processes that involve a wide array of stakeholders, including many who are not formal decision-makers.(9) This environment is ill-suited to aggressive or "pushy" sales tactics. (10) Instead, success is predicated on building genuine, long-term relationships. Trust is the paramount currency; Swedish buyers are demonstrably more likely to do business with people and companies they know and trust, sometimes even when the product is not a perfect fit. (9)

This confluence of factors creates the central paradox of Swedish B2B marketing: while companies and their customers are operating on sophisticated digital platforms, the marketing strategies deployed are often fundamentally misaligned with the long, trust-based, multi-stakeholder buying journey. Firms are digitally active—running ads, producing content, automating emails—but not strategically effective. They are playing a 21st-century digital game with a 20th-century tactical rulebook.

The implications of this paradox are profound and reframe the entire purpose of B2B marketing in Sweden. The combination of a long, consensus-driven sales cycle and the buyer's preference for independent digital research means that the most critical phase of the buying process concludes before a company's sales team is even aware of the opportunity. A recent Bain & Co. survey revealed a startling fact: 90% of B2B buyers have a set list of vendors in mind before they begin their formal research, and 90% of them will ultimately choose a vendor from that initial list. (5)

The logical chain is inescapable:

1. The Swedish buying process is long and requires building consensus among many stakeholders.9

2. Buyers use this extended period to conduct deep, self-directed research online, educating themselves on solutions and potential partners.8

3. Consequently, they form strong opinions and a shortlist of trusted, familiar brands very early in their journey—the "day one list".(5)

4. Therefore, marketing strategies that are overwhelmingly focused on capturing late-stage, bottom-of-funnel leads (e.g., paid search for "buy now" keywords, gated content for MQLs) are targeting buyers who, in all probability, have already made up their minds.

5. The true marketing battle in Sweden is not for the individual lead; it is for a coveted spot on that "day one" consideration list. This requires a long-term strategy centered on building brand awareness, credibility, and what is known as "mental availability".(3)

This reality stands in stark contrast to the tactical, short-term focus that defines many B2B marketing efforts. The result is a cycle of inefficiency, wasted resources, and missed opportunities. The following table provides a diagnostic overview, connecting the common operational pain points experienced by many Swedish B2B firms to the three core strategic mistakes that this report will dissect in detail.

Mistake #1 - The Inward Gaze: Product-Centrism in a Customer-Powered World

The most fundamental error in modern B2B marketing is the inward gaze: a deep-seated organizational focus on the product, its features, and the company's internal perspective, rather than an obsessive focus on the customer's world. This product-centric mindset is a relic of a bygone era but remains stubbornly persistent. It manifests in several distinct and damaging ways.

First is the failure to define a clear target audience. In an attempt to maximize reach, many companies cast their nets too wide, creating generic messaging that ultimately appeals to no one. (2) This stems from a lack of investment in developing detailed Ideal Customer Profiles (ICPs) and rich, data-driven buyer personas that go beyond simple demographics to capture pain points, buying behaviors, and motivations. (2)

Second is the pervasive tendency to market product features instead of customer benefits. Companies, justifiably proud of the products they have spent years developing, fall into the trap of detailing what their product does, rather than what it does for the customer. (10) The harsh reality is that prospects are not interested in your product; they are interested in solving their problems. This feature-focused communication often employs unnecessary technical jargon in a misguided attempt to sound authoritative, which only serves to alienate and confuse the audience. (16)

These issues culminate in a weak or poorly defined value proposition. When a company does not deeply understand its audience or how to frame its product in terms of customer benefits, it becomes incapable of clearly articulating the unique value it offers, leading to muddled and ineffective marketing efforts. (17)

The Consultant's Trap: The Hollow Persona

This strategic flaw is often exacerbated by the very marketing consultants hired to fix it. Many agencies prioritize a superficial, design-first approach over a rigorous, strategy-first one. (6) They conduct "persona workshops" that are little more than brainstorming sessions, resulting in aesthetically pleasing but strategically hollow artifacts. These consultants may create mood boards and design-focused strategies but fail to invest the time required for deep industry and customer research. (6) This lack of genuine understanding is compounded when the agency outsources the actual work to a revolving door of freelancers who have no context for the client's business, a practice dubbed "freelancer roulette". (6) The outcome is a set of generic, templated solutions that look professional but lack the specific insights needed to drive real results.

Hypothetical Scenario: SvenskTech Solutions AB

Consider "SvenskTech Solutions AB," a hypothetical Stockholm-based SaaS company that has developed a powerful and highly advanced project management tool. Their marketing collateral, dense with technical jargon, meticulously lists its dozens of sophisticated features, from Gantt charts to resource-leveling algorithms.16 Facing sluggish growth, they engage a marketing consultancy. The consultancy conducts two brief interviews and, drawing on industry assumptions, produces a set of visually impressive "buyer personas" for "Patrik the Project Manager" and "Katarina the CTO."

The subsequent marketing campaigns, tailored to these personas, fail to generate traction, and sales remain dismal. User adoption among the few clients they do win is alarmingly low. A post-failure internal review, involving deep ethnographic interviews with target customers, reveals a critical strategic error. Their target customers—overburdened managers in fast-moving tech firms—were not looking to "hire" a tool for comprehensive project management. Their real, underlying "job-to-be-done" was "demonstrating progress to anxious stakeholders with minimal administrative overhead." The platform's complexity and myriad features created more administrative work, directly opposing the job they needed to accomplish. The marketing, focused on features, never once addressed the core emotional needs for security, control, and efficiency that drove their prospects' behavior.

The Fix: The Customer-Centric Revolution

The antidote to the inward gaze is a complete strategic reorientation toward customer-centricity. This is not a new or "soft" concept but a hard-edged business strategy with roots in the foundational principles of modern management. As early as 1954, Peter Drucker stated, "It is the customer who determines what a business is, what it produces, and whether it will prosper". (18) This philosophy posits that a business's purpose is the creationand maintenance of satisfied customers, and that true value lies not in products, but in "satisfying experiences". (18) A modern customer-centric strategy aligns the company's products and services with the needs of its most valuable customers to maximize their long-term financial value to the firm. (18)

While the strategic goal is clear, its execution can be fraught with challenges. Academic research has shown that while a customer-centric organizational structure can increase customer satisfaction, it can also degrade short-term economic performance by introducing new coordination costs not present in a product-centric model. (18) This creates a difficult paradox for leaders: the correct long-term strategy may appear as a short-term failure, making it a risky proposition for those judged on quarterly results. This explains why many companies pay lip service to customer-centricity, engaging in superficial activities like the persona workshops described above, without committing to the deep, structural changes required for success.

The solution is not to abandon the strategy, but to implement it with intelligence and precision, focusing investment on understanding and serving the most valuable customers. This requires two key components: a powerful theoretical framework and a disciplined, actionable process.

Theoretical Framework: Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD)

The Jobs-to-be-Done theory provides the necessary lens for a truly customer-centric approach. Popularized by innovators like Clay Christensen and Tony Ulwick, JTBD is based on a simple but profound notion: customers don't buy products; they "hire" them to get a "job" done.(12) This framework shifts the focus away from the product and its features and onto the underlying process, goal, or progress the customer is trying to achieve. (12)

In a B2B context, this is especially powerful but also more complex. The "customer" is not a single entity but a buying committee, and the "job" differs for each stakeholder.12 A successful JTBD analysis in B2B must uncover:

• The Main Functional Job: The primary task or outcome the organization is trying to achieve (e.g., "manage our supply chain more efficiently").

• Related Functional Jobs: Ancillary tasks that must be completed before, during, or after the main job (e.g., "integrate new software with existing ERP systems").

• Emotional and Social Jobs: How the individuals involved want to feel or be perceived while doing the job (e.g., "feel secure in our compliance," "be seen as an innovator by my peers," "reduce personal career risk").

Understanding these distinct but interconnected jobs is the key to crafting a value proposition and messaging that resonates with the entire buying committee.

Actionable Process: A Guide to B2B Fieldwork & UX Research

A theoretical framework is useless without data. The insights required for a JTBD-driven strategy cannot be found in internal brainstorming sessions; they must be excavated through rigorous, real-world customer research. This B2B fieldwork is the engine of customer-centricity.

1. Go to the Source (Primary Research): The foundation of understanding is direct engagement. This means moving beyond assumptions and conducting qualitative research such as in-depth interviews (IDIs) with key personas, focus groups to test messaging, and ethnographic on-site observation to see how the "job" is actually performed in its natural environment. (23) This is how you discover the unstated needs and workarounds that signal true innovation opportunities.

2. Map the Entire Multi-Stakeholder Journey: A comprehensive understanding requires a holistic view. This involves collecting both qualitative data (from interviews, surveys, and customer support interactions) and quantitative data (from web analytics, CRM systems, and transaction histories). (26) This data must be used to construct a detailed B2B customer journey map that explicitly accounts for the different touchpoints, needs, and pain points of every key stakeholder in the decision-making unit—from the end-user to the department head to the CFO. (22)

3. Leverage Internal Experts: Often, the richest source of qualitative customer insight is already inside the organization. The sales and customer service teams are on the front lines, hearing about customer challenges, objections, and successes every day. (28) A systematic process for capturing, analyzing, and integrating this "voice of the customer" data into the marketing strategy is a low-cost, high-impact way to fuel customer-centricity. (22)

4. Apply B2B UX Research Methods: User Experience (UX) research is not just for product design; its principles are critical for marketing. It involves a systematic process of identifying the users, the tasks they perform, the tools they currently use, and the environment they operate in. (30) This research, conducted
   before major marketing campaigns are developed, ensures that messaging, content, and channel selection are all aligned with the user's actual context and needs, dramatically increasing their relevance and effectiveness.

By committing to this disciplined process of discovery, a company can move from an inward-facing, product-obsessed monologue to a customer-centric, problem-solving dialogue. This is the first and most critical step toward building a marketing strategy that creates sustainable value.

Mistake #2 - The Performance Mirage: Chasing Short-Term Metrics Off a Long-Term Cliff

The second critical mistake crippling Swedish B2B companies is an organizational addiction to the immediate, tangible, and often misleading feedback of short-term performance metrics. This manifests as a strategic obsession with bottom-of-the-funnel activities, sacrificing long-term health for the illusion of quarterly progress. This "performance mirage" is seductive because it appears data-driven, but it leads companies to chase vanity metrics off a long-term competitive cliff.

The most glaring symptom of this short-termism is a severely imbalanced marketing budget. Research indicates that while the optimal allocation between brand-building and activation (lead generation) in B2B is approximately 60/40 in favor of the brand, many organizations invert this, with a staggering 80% of budgets devoted to lead-gen efforts. (5) This leads to a relentless focus on quantity over quality, a "numbers game" of generating a high volume of leads, many of whom are poorly qualified and have a low probability of converting into paying customers. (15)

This flawed approach is perpetuated by a fundamental challenge in measurement. While 83% of marketing leaders now identify proving Return on Investment (ROI) as their top priority, a mere 36% feel they can measure it accurately. (32) This is because they are measuring the wrong things. They track easily quantifiable but strategically shallow metrics like clicks, impressions, and Marketing Qualified Leads (MQLs), while failing to connect their efforts to the metrics that truly matter to the business: pipeline value, customer lifetime value (LTV), market share, and profitability. This challenge is particularly acute in markets with long sales cycles, like the UK, where 87% of B2B marketers report finding it difficult to measure the long-term effects of their initiatives. (33)

The Consultant's Trap: The Vicious Cycle of Tactics

Marketing consultancies and agencies are often key enablers of this destructive cycle. Their business models are frequently project-based or retainer-based, incentivizing a continuous stream of tactical activities like PPC campaigns, social media ads, and email blasts. (7) These tactics are easy to sell, quick to execute, and simple to report on using dashboards filled with vanity metrics. An agency can present a chart showing a month-over-month increase in "leads" or "website traffic" without ever being held accountable for whether those activities generated a single krona of profitable revenue. (6)

This creates a perverse incentive structure. Agencies promise anything to win the business 6, focus on "shiny object" tactics that look impressive but lack strategic depth (6), and then, when the time comes to demonstrate value, they point to the tactical KPIs they knew they could easily move. This leaves the client with a sense of activity but no real business impact, perpetuating the cycle of short-term thinking.

Hypothetical Scenario: IndustriTeknik AB

Imagine "IndustriTeknik AB," a Gothenburg-based manufacturer of specialized industrial components. The board is pressuring the new CMO to "get more leads, fast." The CMO hires a digital marketing agency that promises to "fill the sales funnel." The agency quickly launches aggressive advertising campaigns on LinkedIn and Google, targeting keywords related to their product categories.

At the end of the first quarter, the agency presents a glowing report to the leadership team. MQLs are up 200%, and the cost-per-lead (CPL) is impressively low. The CMO is initially pleased. However, the sales department is irate. The sales director reports that the "leads" are overwhelmingly low-quality: students who downloaded a technical paper for a university project, procurement officers from non-target industries just collecting quotes, and even competitors conducting research. The team's lead-to-opportunity conversion rate has plummeted. Because the sales team is now wasting hundreds of hours chasing these unqualified leads, the actual Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) for real, closed-won deals has skyrocketed.

IndustriTeknik AB has fallen victim to the performance mirage. They successfully hit their tactical KPIs but utterly failed their strategic business objectives. With no brand recognition or trust in the market, they are forced to overspend on advertising to capture any attention at all, effectively paying a "tax" for their lack of brand awareness.(3)

The Fix: Building Defensible Brand Equity

The only way to escape the performance mirage is to reject the false choice between performance and brand, and instead embrace a strategy that builds long-term, defensible brand equity. A strong brand is not a "fluffy" marketing concept; it is a hard-nosed financial asset that drives sustainable profitability.

The Financial Case for B2B Brand

The evidence for the financial impact of brand is overwhelming. B2B companies with strong brands not only grow faster but also achieve higher profitability than their peers.(28) A strong brand directly lowers CAC, as it is easier and cheaper to generate leads when buyers already recognize and trust your name.(3) Simultaneously, it increases LTV by fostering loyalty, improving retention, and enabling premium pricing.(3) Research shows 71% of customers will stay with brands they trust.(3)

Crucially, brand-building is not at odds with short-term performance; it is a powerful amplifier of it. Brand marketing casts a "halo effect" on all bottom-of-funnel activation. When people have heard of your brand, they are more likely to click on your ads and convert, which lowers CPLs and increases conversion rates across the board. (4)

Perhaps the most significant financial benefit is pricing power. As Warren Buffett has argued, this is one of the most important assets a business can have. Research by marketing professor Mark Ritson highlights that a 1% increase in price can deliver a 10% lift in profitability, a far greater impact than a 1% increase in sales volume.(4) Strong brands can command premium prices, creating a durable competitive advantage that is difficult for competitors to erode.

Theoretical Foundation: Brand Equity Models

To build this asset systematically, leaders need a clear framework. Brand Equity refers to the value a company gains from its name, reputation, and the perceptions consumers hold about it.(35) Two foundational models provide a roadmap for its construction:

• Aaker's Brand Equity Model: David Aaker defines brand equity as a set of assets linked to a brand. This model provides a clear inventory of what to build, comprising five key components: Brand Loyalty, Brand Awareness, Perceived Quality, Brand Associations (the thoughts and feelings a customer connects with the brand), and Proprietary Assets (like patents and trademarks).(38)

• Keller's Customer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE) Model: Kevin Lane Keller's model provides a sequential roadmap for building a strong brand, structured as a pyramid with four ascending levels. It starts with establishing Brand Identity (Who are you?), then building Brand Meaning through performance and imagery (What are you?). This leads to eliciting positive Brand Responses in terms of judgments and feelings (What about you?), and culminates in forging Brand Resonance, an intense, active, and loyal relationship (What about you and me?).(39)

These models transform brand-building from an abstract art into a manageable, strategic process.

Actionable Process: Data-Backed Creativity and Content

Building brand equity is not about bigger logos or flashier advertisements. It is about creating meaning and emotional connection through a disciplined, strategic process.

1. Shift from Business-to-Business (B2B) to Business-to-Human (B2H): The most profound error in B2B marketing is forgetting that behind every business decision is a human being. These people are not stoic, rational automatons; they are influenced by the same emotions, stories, and humor as any consumer.(40) Research shows that emotional marketing strategies in B2B drive seven times more business impact than purely rational campaigns.(5) This requires abandoning impenetrable jargon 16 and communicating with authenticity and empathy.

2. Embrace "Defensible Creative": Creativity in B2B is not about unbridled artistic expression; it is about strategic, accountable, and results-driven imagination. "Defensible creative" is the intersection of insight and imagination—creative work built on a foundation of customer research and validated by data.(41) It is a campaign concept that can be confidently explained and supported in the boardroom because it is aligned with business objectives and has been tested to ensure it resonates with the target audience. This approach turns bold ideas into measurable business results.

3. Invest in High-Value Thought Leadership: In the B2B world, expertise is a cornerstone of trust. High-quality thought leadership—content that educates, challenges, and provides genuine value—is a powerful tool for building brand equity. A study by Edelman and LinkedIn found that 55% of decision-makers use thought leadership to vet potential vendors, and a remarkable 61% are willing to pay a premium to work with a company that delivers it.(11) This directly builds the "Perceived Quality" and positive "Brand Associations" that Aaker's model identifies as core components of equity.

The tension between brand building and performance marketing is a false dichotomy. They are not opposing forces but two essential parts of a single, synergistic system. Brand building is the long-term capital investment that creates favorable market conditions—awareness, trust, and preference. Performance marketing is the short-term activation that capitalizes on those conditions to drive revenue. A strategy that starves one to feed the other is destined to fail. The role of leadership is to champion a balanced investment model—like the 60/40 split—and shift the measurement conversation from short-term CPL to the long-term impact of brand on LTV, CAC reduction, and pricing power. This reframes brand not as a marketing expense, but as a critical driver of the company's financial valuation.

Mistake #3 - The Siloed Machine: Disconnected Efforts and Wasted Potential

The third and perhaps most insidious mistake undermining B2B growth is the failure of internal teams—most critically, Sales and Marketing—to operate as a single, unified force. This organizational misalignment is not a minor operational friction but a deep, structural flaw that actively sabotages strategy, wastes vast resources, and creates a fractured, incoherent experience for the customer.

The chasm between these two departments is a well-documented and persistent problem. Surveys consistently show that while business leaders recognize sales and marketing alignment as the single largest opportunity for improving business performance, it remains one of the top challenges for B2B marketers.(14) The cost of this disconnect is staggering. Companies with poor alignment suffer from 19% slower growth and 15% lower profitability than their aligned counterparts.(14) By some estimates, this misalignment can cost a company as much as 10% of its annual revenue.(2)

This is not an abstract financial calculation; the waste is tangible and infuriatingly concrete. A landmark report from LinkedIn revealed that a shocking 80% of the content meticulously created by marketing teams is never used by the sales department, typically because it is considered irrelevant to the buyer's actual needs or conversation stage.(13) This represents a colossal squandering of marketing budget, creative energy, and strategic effort.

Ultimately, the greatest victim of this internal discord is the customer. When sales and marketing operate from different playbooks, it results in inconsistent messaging, a confusing and disjointed buyer journey, and qualified leads falling through the cracks between departmental silos.(17) In a trust-based market like Sweden, where long-term relationship building is paramount, this fractured experience can be fatal to a deal.

The Consultant's Trap: Reinforcing the Silos

External consultants and agencies, often hired to bridge these gaps, frequently make the problem worse. The common practice of hiring separate, specialized agencies for "marketing," "sales enablement," "PR," and "creative" actively reinforces and institutionalizes the very silos the company needs to break down.(6) These agencies operate with their own goals, metrics, and methodologies, with little incentive or mechanism for true cross-functional collaboration.

This structure breeds a profound lack of accountability. When a campaign fails to generate revenue, the marketing agency can blame the sales team for poor or slow follow-up. The sales team, in turn, can blame the marketing agency for providing low-quality leads. The client is left in the middle, paying multiple retainers with no single partner taking ownership of the only outcome that matters: profitable growth. This is often made worse by agency structures where client-facing project managers have no direct marketing experience, acting as mere go-betweens who create frustrating communication bottlenecks: "I've noted your question and will pass it on to our internal team".(34)

Hypothetical Scenario: Finanssäker AB

Consider "Finanssäker AB," a Swedish fintech company providing sophisticated compliance software. Their marketing team, working with a prestigious creative agency, launches a brand campaign centered on "AI-driven innovation and future-proofing your business." The content is visionary, high-level, and designed to generate excitement and establish thought leadership.

Simultaneously, the sales team, guided by a separate sales training consultant, is equipped with a sales deck and call scripts focused on a much more pragmatic message: "meeting current regulatory requirements and avoiding costly fines." Their approach is grounded in risk aversion and immediate operational needs.

The result is chaos. A prospect, perhaps a Chief Technology Officer, is attracted by the visionary "innovation" message from a webinar. When they are handed over to a salesperson, they are met with a tactical pitch about "compliance" that feels completely disconnected from their initial interest. The conversation stalls. The sales team complains to management that the leads from marketing are "just dreamers, not real buyers." The marketing team complains that the sales team "doesn't understand the vision and can't sell to a strategic audience." The deal, which had real potential, dies in the chasm between the two departments because the company was telling two completely different stories.

The Fix: Engineering the 'Smarketing' Growth Engine

The solution to the siloed machine is the deliberate and systematic integration of sales and marketing into a single, cohesive revenue-generating unit. This integrated approach, often called "Smarketing," is not about forcing teams to be friends; it is about re-engineering processes, goals, and systems to create a unified commercial engine.(13)

This transformation is built on five operational pillars:

1. Shared Language and Goals: Alignment begins with a shared understanding. Both teams must collaborate to create and commit to a single, unambiguous definition for the Ideal Customer Profile (ICP), buyer personas, and every stage of the funnel (e.g., Marketing Qualified Lead, Sales Qualified Lead, Sales Accepted Lead).(46) Critically, their primary goals must be shared and revenue-focused. Instead of marketing being measured on "website traffic" and sales on "calls made," both teams must be held accountable for joint KPIs like pipeline growth, customer acquisition cost, and total revenue generated.(29)

2. Integrated Communication and Collaboration: Silos are broken down by consistent and structured communication. This requires a formal cadence of meetings, such as weekly smarketing status meetings to review campaigns and leads, and monthly or quarterly deep-dive sessions for all members of both teams to discuss strategy and share insights.(46) This must be supported by a dedicated, shared communication channel (e.g., a "smarketing" Slack channel) for real-time collaboration. Crucially, this alignment must start at the top; the relationship and collaboration between the CMO and the Head of Sales will set the tone for the entire organization.(46)

3. A Formal Service Level Agreement (SLA): To move from informal cooperation to formal accountability, a Marketing-Sales SLA is essential. This is an internal contract that codifies the commitments each team makes to the other.(13) Marketing commits to delivering a specific quantity and, more importantly, quality of qualified leads each month. In return, Sales commits to a specific process for lead follow-up, including the speed of first contact and the number of outreach attempts before a lead is dispositioned. This creates a closed-loop system of mutual accountability.

4. Shared Knowledge and Resources: To eliminate the "80% of unused content" problem, knowledge must flow freely between the two teams. Marketers should regularly shadow sales calls to hear the authentic voice of the customer, their objections, and their pain points firsthand.(29) Sales must have a simple, structured process for providing feedback on lead quality and content effectiveness. This feedback loop informs the creation of a centralized library of pre-approved messaging frameworks, value propositions, and sales enablement content that both teams use, ensuring a consistent story is told at every touchpoint.(2)

5. A Unified Technology Stack: Technology is the backbone of modern smarketing. A shared Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform and marketing automation system is non-negotiable.(17) This creates a single source of truth for all customer data and interactions. It allows for the seamless, automated handoff of leads from marketing to sales, provides visibility for both teams into the full customer lifecycle, and enables the creation of a unified, 360-degree view of the customer journey.(47)

Ultimately, the journey that begins with "Smarketing" logically evolves into a more comprehensive function known as Revenue Operations (RevOps). While Smarketing focuses on aligning sales and marketing, RevOps extends this philosophy to include all revenue-related, go-to-market functions, including customer success, service, and channel partners.(13) This holistic model breaks down all commercial silos to manage the entire customer lifecycle as one continuous, end-to-end process. The benefits are significant: B2B organizations that have adopted a RevOps model are 1.4 times more likely to exceed their revenue goals by 10% or more compared to their non-RevOps peers.(48) Therefore, Smarketing should be viewed not as the final destination, but as the critical first phase in building a truly modern, integrated, and high-performance revenue engine.

Conclusion: A Blueprint for Profitable Growth in the Swedish B2B Landscape

The analysis presented in this report identifies three profound, strategic mistakes that are deeply embedded in the operations of many Swedish B2B companies: a product-centric Inward Gaze, a focus on misleading short-term metrics creating a Performance Mirage, and a fragmented organizational structure resulting in a Siloed Machine. These are not independent failings; they are interconnected flaws that reinforce one another, creating a cycle of strategic underperformance. A company that looks inward cannot build a resonant brand, and a company with a weak brand and siloed teams cannot execute a truly customer-centric strategy.

To break this cycle, leaders must embrace a cohesive set of strategic imperatives. These are not items on a checklist but pillars of a single, integrated growth architecture:

• Customer-Centricity provides the foundational insight. Through rigorous fieldwork and the application of frameworks like Jobs-to-be-Done, it answers the question: "What problems are we really solving for our most valuable customers?"

• Defensible Brand Equity translates that insight into a market advantage. It uses data-backed creativity and high-value content to build the awareness, trust, and emotional connection necessary to earn a place on the customer's "day one" consideration list and command pricing power.

• A 'Smarketing' and RevOps Engine ensures that the brand promise is delivered flawlessly and efficiently. It aligns all commercial functions—sales, marketing, and service—around the customer, creating a seamless experience and a culture of shared accountability for revenue.

Adopting this framework requires a fundamental shift away from the prevalent model of outsourcing tactical marketing functions to a revolving door of specialized, project-based consultants. This old model perpetuates short-term thinking and reinforces organizational silos. The path forward demands building these strategic capabilities in-house or, for those who need external support, seeking a true strategic partner who operates as an embedded extension of the leadership team, sharing accountability for long-term business outcomes, not just campaign deliverables.(34)

This transformation is not a marketing initiative to be delegated to the marketing department. It is a C-suite-level business strategy that must be championed from the top. It requires a change in how success is measured, how budgets are allocated, and how teams are structured and incentivized. It is a commitment to the patient, disciplined work of building a company that is oriented around its customers, valued for its brand, and engineered for growth.

To begin this journey, leaders can use the following diagnostic tool to assess their organization's current strategic maturity and identify the most urgent areas for transformation.

The Swedish B2B Strategic Marketing Scorecard

Use the following scorecard to rate your organization's maturity on a scale of 1 (Strongly Disagree/Never) to 5 (Strongly Agree/Always) for each statement. This tool is designed to move beyond anecdotal evidence and provide a data-driven starting point for strategic discussions.

Section 1: Customer-Centricity Maturity

• Our marketing messages and value propositions are based on deep, qualitative customer fieldwork (e.g., in-depth interviews, on-site observation), not just internal assumptions or quantitative data. (Score 1-5)

• We utilize a framework like Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD) to understand the underlying functional, emotional, and social "jobs" our customers are trying to accomplish, beyond their stated needs. (Score 1-5)

• Our value proposition is consistently defined and communicated in terms of the customer's benefit and the problems we solve, not our product's features. (Score 1-5)

• We have detailed, research-backed buyer personas for all key members of the decision-making unit (e.g., user, buyer, influencer, executive) that are actively used to guide marketing and sales strategy. (Score 1-5)

• We systematically apply UX research principles to understand our customers' context, tasks, and environment before developing major marketing campaigns. (Score 1-5)
  Subtotal for Section 1: ___ / 25

Section 2: Brand Equity Maturity

• Our marketing budget is strategically and deliberately balanced between long-term brand-building activities and short-term sales activation/lead generation. (Score 1-5)

• We consistently measure and report on long-term brand health metrics (e.g., brand awareness, perceived quality, brand associations, share of voice) alongside short-term performance metrics (e.g., CPL, MQLs). (Score 1-5)

• Our creative development process is "defensible," meaning it is guided by customer insights and data, and is designed to build an emotional connection (B2H), not just communicate rational benefits. (Score 1-5)

• We have a dedicated thought leadership program that produces high-value content designed to build credibility and trust, positioning us as an expert in our field. (Score 1-5)

• Our brand strategy gives us measurable pricing power, allowing us to compete on value rather than defaulting to price discounts. (Score 1-5)
  Subtotal for Section 2: ___ / 25

Section 3: Smarketing & RevOps Alignment Maturity

• Sales and Marketing have a formal, written Service Level Agreement (SLA) that defines mutual commitments and is underpinned by shared, revenue-focused goals (e.g., pipeline generated, revenue growth). (Score 1-5)

• The content and sales enablement materials produced by Marketing are consistently and effectively used by the Sales team in their process. (Score 1-5)

• We have a structured, consistent process for Sales to provide feedback to Marketing on lead quality and content effectiveness, and this feedback is used to optimize future campaigns. (Score 1-5)

• We operate on a unified technology stack (e.g., shared CRM and marketing automation platform) that provides a single, transparent view of the entire customer journey for both teams. (Score 1-5)

• Our commercial operations extend beyond Sales and Marketing to include Customer Success/Service, creating a cohesive end-to-end customer lifecycle management process (RevOps). (Score 1-5)
  Subtotal for Section 3: ___ / 25

Total Score: ___ / 75

Scoring Guide:

• Below 25 (Foundational Gaps): Your organization is likely operating with significant strategic disadvantages. The focus is highly tactical, leading to inefficiency, wasted resources, and vulnerability to more strategically mature competitors. Immediate, C-suite-led intervention is required, starting with Mistake #1.

• 25-50 (Tactical Proficiency, Strategic Weakness): Your organization has pockets of effectiveness but lacks a cohesive, overarching strategy. You may be good at executing specific tactics (e.g., running ad campaigns) but struggle to translate that activity into sustainable, profitable growth. The priority is to address Mistake #3 to build an aligned engine, then use that engine to tackle Mistake #2.

• 51 and Above (On the Path to Market Leadership): Your organization has a strong strategic foundation. The focus should be on continuous optimization, deepening customer insight, and extending alignment across the entire enterprise to build a durable, long-term competitive moat.

Works cited

1. Sweden E-commerce Market Overview - International Trade Administration, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.trade.gov/market-intelligence/sweden-e-commerce-market-overview

2. 8 Common B2B Lead Generation Mistakes to Avoid, accessed July 22, 2025, https://leadsatscale.com/insights/8-common-b2b-lead-generation-mistakes-to-avoid/

3. Why Investing in Brand is Essential for Long-Term B2B Success - Pavilion, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.joinpavilion.com/blog/why-investing-in-brand-is-essential-for-long-term-b2b-success

4. Peter Weinberg's 6 Benefits To Brand Building in B2B Markets, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.b2binternational.com/publications/6-benefits-to-brand-building/

5. Shift the Focus: Why B2B Brands Should Invest More in Business-to-Human Brand Building, accessed July 22, 2025, https://junction59.com/news-pov/shift-the-focus-why-b2b-brands-should-invest-more-in-business-to-human-brand-building/

6. 10 Pitfalls of B2B Agency Marketing & How to Avoid Them | Innovaxis, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.innovaxisinc.com/b2b-marketing-strategy-blog/10-pitfalls-of-flawed-b2b-agency-marketing-how-to-avoid-them

7. Should you hire a B2B digital marketing consultant for strategy?, accessed July 22, 2025, https://digital-hydra.com/blog/should-you-hire-a-b2b-digital-marketing-consultant-for-strategy

8. Challenges and opportunities in the digitalization of the B2B ..., accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/jbim-12-2023-0714/full/html

9. How to Go-to-Market in the Nordics - Dealfront, accessed July 22, 2025, https://marketing.dealfront.com/dealfront-gtm-guide-nordics.pdf

10. B2B sales mistakes: How to avoid 5 common errors | BDC.ca, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.bdc.ca/en/articles-tools/marketing-sales-export/sales/sales-mistakes-businesses-must-avoid

11. 21 B2B Content Marketing Statistics to Know in 2024 | NYTLicensing, accessed July 22, 2025, https://nytlicensing.com/latest/trends/b2b-content-marketing-2021/

12. How to use Jobs-to-be-Done in B2B - Hyperact, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.hyperact.co.uk/blog/jobs-to-be-done-b2b

13. Sales & Marketing Alignment: Path to Revenue Growth 2025 - Improvado, accessed July 22, 2025, https://improvado.io/blog/sales-and-marketing-alignment

14. Smarketing Secrets: The Importance of Sales and Marketing Alignment - Avista, accessed July 22, 2025, https://avistapr.com/smarketing-secrets-the-importance-of-sales-and-marketing-alignment/

15. 5 Common B2B Marketing Mistakes You Might Be Making - CMDS, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.cmdsonline.com/blog/b2b-marketing/5-common-b2b-marketing-mistakes-you-might-be-making/

16. 6 B2B marketing mistakes to avoid | Factors Blog - Factors.ai, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.factors.ai/blog/6-b2b-marketing-mistakes-to-avoid

17. 10 common B2B marketing mistakes—and how to avoid them - Agility PR Solutions, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.agilitypr.com/pr-news/public-relations/10-common-b2b-marketing-mistakes-and-how-to-avoid-them/

18. Customer Centricity | Encyclopedia MDPI, accessed July 22, 2025, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/2192

19. Jobs-to-be-Done | A Comprehensive Guide - Strategyn, accessed July 22, 2025, https://strategyn.com/jobs-to-be-done/

20. strategyn.com, accessed July 22, 2025, https://strategyn.com/jobs-to-be-done/#:~:text=JTBD%20Theory%20is%20based%20on,value%20creation%20around%20those%20needs.

21. Jobs-To-Be-Done (JTBD) Framework in B2B Research - Adience, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.adience.com/blog/how-to/how-to-use-the-jobs-to-be-done-framework-in-b2b-research/

22. Introduction to B2B UX Research Challenges and How to Navigate Them with 7 Strategies, accessed July 22, 2025, https://staffbase.design/introduction-to-b2b-ux-research-challenges-and-how-to-navigate-them-with-7-strategies-a6a918c77edd

23. B2B Go To Market Strategy | How to succeed using Market Research - FieldworkHub, accessed July 22, 2025, https://fieldworkhub.com/resources/blog/b2b-go-to-market-strategy/

24. What is B2B market research? - Acumen Fieldwork, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.acumenfieldwork.com/what-is-b2b-market-research/

25. B2B UX research: examples, best practices and challenges, accessed July 22, 2025, https://blog.ferpection.com/en/b2b-ux-research-examples-best-practices-and-challenges

26. Our complete guide on how to map the B2B customer journey - TheyDo, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.theydo.com/blog/articles/b2b-customer-journey

27. The Complete Guide to B2B Customer Experience - Qualtrics, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.qualtrics.com/experience-management/customer/b2b-customer-experience/

28. Discover the powerful impact of B2B branding in a crowded marketplace - Equinet Media, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.equinetmedia.com/blog/discover-the-powerful-impact-of-b2b-branding-in-a-crowded-marketplace

29. What is Smarketing? 5 Tips to Align Your Sales and Marketing Teams | Paperflite, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.paperflite.com/blogs/smarketing-aligning-sales-and-marketing

30. UX Research for B2B Companies: Tips and Advantages | Aguayo's Blog, accessed July 22, 2025, https://aguayo.co/en/blog-aguayo-user-experience/ux-research-for-b2b-companies-tips-and-advantages/

31. Is UX research, in a very specialist B2B space with no existing users, possible?, accessed July 22, 2025, https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/116114/is-ux-research-in-a-very-specialist-b2b-space-with-no-existing-users-possible

32. Marketing ROI Statistics: 30+ Stats to Boost Your Strategy in 2024 - Firework, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.firework.com/blog/marketing-roi-statistics

33. UK B2B marketers face pressure to show campaign ROI - eCommerceNews UK, accessed July 22, 2025, https://ecommercenews.uk/story/uk-b2b-marketers-face-pressure-to-show-campaign-roi

34. Should you hire a B2B Marketing Consultant? The argument for and against, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.cs2marketing.com/articles/should-you-hire-a-b2b-marketing-consultant-the-argument-for-and-against

35. What Is Brand Equity? (+ How to Build It) - Coursera, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.coursera.org/articles/brand-equity

36. Brand equity - Wikipedia, accessed July 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand_equity

37. Brand Equity: Definition, Importance, Effect on Profit Margins, and Examples - Investopedia, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/brandequity.asp

38. What is brand equity model? - Clootrack, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.clootrack.com/knowledge/brand-experience-management/what-is-brand-equity-model

39. Understanding and applying brand equity models - Brandwell, accessed July 22, 2025, https://brandwell.com.au/understanding-and-applying-brand-equity-models/

40. Creativity is a non-negotiable in the best B2B marketing | The Drum, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.thedrum.com/opinion/2025/02/18/creativity-non-negotiable-the-best-b2b-marketing

41. Defensible Creative: Why Data-Backed Ideas Win in B2B Marketing, accessed July 22, 2025, https://elevationb2b.com/blog/defensible-creative-why-data-backed-ideas-win-in-b2b-marketing/

42. 2024 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Report, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.edelman.com/expertise/Business-Marketing/2024-b2b-thought-leadership-report

43. European B2B Marketers More Digitally Mature in Strategy and Data Than Tech Use, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.marketingcharts.com/demographics-and-audiences/europe-demographics-and-audiences-229118

44. The 2024 B2B Marketing Outlook: The Data Confidence Divide - Anteriad, accessed July 22, 2025, https://anteriad.com/ebooks/2024-b2b-marketing-data-report

45. A Complete Guide To Common B2B Marketing Mistakes - OrangeOwl, accessed July 22, 2025, https://orangeowl.marketing/b2b-marketing/common-b2b-marketing-mistakes/

46. Smarketing: a Complete Sales and Marketing Alignment Guide - 6Minded Blog, accessed July 22, 2025, https://blog.6minded.com/sales-marketing-alignment-guide

47. Why Customer-Centricity Drives Sustainable B2B Growth - SuperOffice CRM, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.superoffice.com/blog/how-to-create-a-customer-centric-strategy/

48. 2024 B2B sales research | Deloitte Digital, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.deloittedigital.com/us/en/insights/research/thrive-in-the-future-of-sales.html

49. 10 Best B2B Marketing Consultants (Updated for 2025) - Gripped, accessed July 22, 2025, https://gripped.io/digital-marketing-strategy/b2b-marketing-consultant/